Throw out relative performance tables: FinsiaBY MARK SMITH | THURSDAY, 11 SEP 2014 12:25PMThe way superannuation funds measure performance should be thrown out and replaced with a system which discourages short-termism and helps consumers think about their retirement pot as an income pool, rather than a pot of gold. Related News |
Editor's Choice
Vanguard Super lowers fees
Vanguard Super is reducing its annual administration fees off the back of strong investment performance and its short time in the market.
Chief member officer leaves Insignia Financial
Insignia Financial is on the hunt for a new chief member officer for its superannuation business, confirming the departure of Anne Coyne.
Super for housing 'economically reckless': SMC
The Super Members Council (SMC) has warned that encouraging young Australians to use their superannuation for a house deposit could dramatically drive-up house prices and deplete their retirement savings.
Treasury shakes up foreign investing framework
Treasury is promising to make Australia a better investment hub for foreigners as it lays out comprehensive reforms to make the system "stronger, more streamlined, and more transparent".
Products
Featured Profile
Robert De Dominicis
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
GBST HOLDINGS LIMITED
GBST HOLDINGS LIMITED
It was during a family sojourn to the seaside town of Pescara, Italy, Rob DeDominicis first laid eyes on what would become the harbinger of his future. Andrew McKean writes.
I couldn't agree more. What needs to be thought of is the long term goals of the superannuant and how much risk do they: (a) need; (b) can they personally tolerate; (c) can their portfolio bear.
It is fine to be top of the tables, but how much risk should have been taken for the client, how much risk was taken to get these returns are very important questions.